ثانی حیدری، ع.، و صفری، ا. (1403). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر قصد رفتاری و رفتار استفاده از فناوری هوش مصنوعی: مطالعه موردی کشت و صنعتهای شرکت کشاورزی رضوی.
اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی. دوره 37، شماره 4، صص 362-378.
https://doi.org/10.22067/jead.2024.88807.1277
غیاثی، ع.، و علم بیگی، ا. (1403). تأثیر مهارتهای نرم یادگیری و ارتباطی بر مهارتهای نرم هوش هیجانی در دانشجویان کشاورزی.
پژوهش مدیریت آموزش کشاورزی، دوره 16، شماره 69، صص 3-18.
https://doi.org/10.22092/jaear.2024.365850.2014
Akhtar, Z. B. (2024). Unveiling the evolution of generative AI (GAI): A comprehensive and investigative analysis toward LLM models (2021–2024) and beyond.
Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology, 11(1), 22.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43067-024-00145-1
Al-Dokhny, A., Alismaiel, O., Youssif, S., Nasr, N., Drwish, A., and Samir, A. (2024). Can multimodal large language models enhance performance benefits among higher education students? An investigation based on the task–technology fit theory and the artificial intelligence device use acceptance model.
Sustainability, 16(23), 10780.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310780
Alhwaiti, M. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence application in the post-covid ERA and its impact on faculty members’ occupational well-being and teaching self efficacy: A path analysis using the UTAUT 2 model.
Applied Artificial Intelligence, 37(1), 2175110.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2023.2175110
Almusawi, H. A., and Durugbo, C. M. (2024). Linking task-technology fit, innovativeness, and teacher readiness using structural equation modelling.
Education and Information Technologies, 29
, 1489-14928.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12440-x
Al-Rahmi, A. M., Shamsuddin, A., Wahab, E., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alturki, U., Aldraiweesh, A., and Almutairy, S. (2022). Integrating the role of UTAUT and TTF model to evaluate social media use for teaching and learning in higher education.
Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 905968.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.905968
Bampasidou, M., Goldgaber, D., Gentimis, T., and Mandalika, A. (2024). Overcoming ‘Digital divides’: leveraging higher education to develop next generation digital agriculture professionals.
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,
224, 109181.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.109181
Bayaga, A. (2024). Leveraging AI-enhanced and emerging technologies for pedagogical innovations in higher education.
Education and Information Technologies, 30, 1045–1072.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13122-y
Chatterjee, S., and Bhattacharjee, K. K. (2020). Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: A quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling.
Education and Information Technologies,
25, 3443-3463.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10159-7
Chen, X., Hu, Z., and Wang, C. (2024). Empowering education development through AIGC: A systematic literature review.
Education and Information Technologies,
29, 17485-17537.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12549-7
Chiu, T. K. (2024). Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI.
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence,
6, 100197.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100197
Crompton, H., and Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field.
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 22.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Dahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Aldraiweesh, A., Alturki, U., Almutairy, S., Shutaleva, A., and Soomro, R. B. (2024). Extended TAM based acceptance of AI-Powered ChatGPT for supporting metacognitive self-regulated learning in education: A mixed-methods study.
Heliyon, 10(8), e29317.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29317
Du, L., and Lv, B. (2024). Factors influencing students’ acceptance and use generative artificial intelligence in elementary education: an expansion of the UTAUT model.
Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 24715-24734.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12835-4
Duong, C. D., Vu, T. N., and Ngo, T. V. N. (2023). Applying a modified technology acceptance model to explain higher education students’ usage of ChatGPT: A serial multiple mediation model with knowledge sharing as a moderator.
The International Journal of Management Education, 21(3), 100883.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100883
Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.
Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Goodhue, D. L., and Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance.
MIS quarterly, 19(2), 213-236.
https://doi.org/10.2307/249689
Gupta, R., Nair, K., Mishra, M., Ibrahim, B., and Bhardwaj, S. (2024). Adoption and impacts of generative artificial intelligence: Theoretical underpinnings and research agenda.
International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4(1), 100232.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100232
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., and Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM.
European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., and Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 3rd Edition. UK: Sage.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., and Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
Jafari, H., Naghshineh, N., Rodríguez, O. A., Keshavarz, H., and Lund, B. (2024). In ChatGPT we trust? Unveiling the dynamics of reuse intention and trust towards generative AI Chatbots among Iranians.
InfoScience Trends,
1(3), 56-72.
https://doi.org/10.61186/ist.202401.01.17
Kanbach, D. K., Heiduk, L., Blueher, G., Schreiter, M., and Lahmann, A. (2024). The GenAI is out of the bottle: generative artificial intelligence from a business model innovation perspective
Review of Managerial Science, 18(4), 1189-1220.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00696-z
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach.
International Journal of e-Collaboration (ijec),
11(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/
10.4018/ijec.2015100101
Kock, N., and Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: The inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods.
Information systems journal,
28(1), 227-261.
https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., and Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT.
Education Sciences, 13(9), 856.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856
Or, C. C. P. (2023). Towards an integrated model: Task-Technology fit in unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2 in education contexts.
Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 151-163.
https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.8
Pallottino, F., Violino, S., Figorilli, S., Pane, C., Aguzzi, J., Colle, G., Nemmi, E., Montaghi, A., Chatzievangelou, D., Antonucci, F., Moscovini, L., Mei, A., Costa, C., and Ortenzi, L. (2025). Applications and perspectives of Generative Artificial Intelligence in agriculture.
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 230, 109919.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.109919
Podsakoff, P. M., Podsakoff, N. P., Williams, L. J., Huang, C., and Yang, J. (2024). Common method bias: It's bad, it's complex, it's widespread, and it's not easy to fix.
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11(1), 17-61.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-040030
Rana, M. M., Siddiqee, M. S., Sakib, M. N., and Ahamed, M. R. (2024). Assessing AI adoption in developing country academia: A trust and privacy-augmented UTAUT framework.
Heliyon, 10(18), e37569.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37569
Rane, J., Kaya, Ö., Mallick, S. K., and Rane, N. L. (2024).
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, Education, and BusinessLondon, UK: Deep Science Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.70593/978-81-981271-7-4
Ryan, M. (2023). The social and ethical impacts of artificial intelligence in agriculture: Mapping the agricultural AI literature.
AI & SOCIETY, 38(6), 2473-2485.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01377-9
Sharma, S., and Singh, G. (2024). Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: an empirical study of the UTAUT model in Indian universities.
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 8(2), 1-27.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02558-7
Spanaki, K., Sivarajah, U., Fakhimi, M., Despoudi, S., and Irani, Z. (2022). Disruptive technologies in agricultural operations: A systematic review of AI-driven AgriTech research.
Annals of Operations Research, 308(1), 491-524.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03922-z
Strzelecki, A., and ElArabawy, S. (2024). Investigation of the moderation effect of gender and study level on the acceptance and use of generative AI by higher education students: Comparative evidence from Poland and Egypt.
British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 1209-1230.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13425
Suhail, F., Adel, M., Al-Emran, M., and AlQudah, A. A. (2024). Are students ready for robots in higher education? Examining the adoption of robots by integrating UTAUT2 and TTF using a hybrid SEM-ANN approach.
Technology in Society, 77, 102524.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102524
Tian, S., and Yang, W. (2024). Modeling the use behavior of interpreting technology for student interpreters: An extension of UTAUT model.
Education and Information Technologies, 29(9), 10499-10528.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12225-2
Tian, W., Ge, J., Zhao, Y., and Zheng, X. (2024). AI Chatbots in Chinese higher education: Adoption, perception, and influence among graduate students—an integrated analysis utilizing UTAUT and ECM models. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1268549.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1268549
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view.
MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.
https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., and Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology.
MIS Quarterly, 36(1) 157-178.
https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., and Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead.
Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328-376.
https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428
Wu, B., and Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model.
Computers in Human Behavior,
67, 221-232.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028
